Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] BALLOT: Plan Review for Jakarta Servlet 6.0

[marceloancelmo <marceloancelmo@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi all,

I declare this ballot complete and approved. The summary of the votes is below.

The project team and Specification Committee may now engage to complete the release.

Congratulations!

Representative	Representative for:	Vote
Kenji Kazumura	Fujitsu	+1
Dan Bandera, Kevin Sutter	IBM	+1
Ed Bratt, Dmitry Kornilov	Oracle	+1
Andrew Pielage, Matt Gill	Payara	+1
Scott Stark, Mark Little	Red Hat	No vote
David Blevins, Jean-Louis Monteiro	Tomitribe	+1
Ivar Grimstad	EE4J PMC	+1
Marcelo Ancelmo, Martijn Verburg	Participant Members	+1
Werner Keil	Committer Members	No vote
Dr. Jun Qian	Enterprise Members	+1
	Total	8

Best Regards,

Marcelo Ancelmo

On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 at 09:38, marceloancelmo <marceloancelmo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello,

  I am preparing to close the ballot, and while counting the votes I cannot find the votes from Committer Members and Red Hat. 

  I apologize if I missed those emails. I will close the ballot soon, so if you have cast your vote, please indicate it in this thread so I can find the email and properly count it

Best Regards,

Marcelo Ancelmo

On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 05:41, 钱军 <qianjun@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

+1(Primeton)

Jun Qian

钱军 普元阿米加

联系我

 

 

 

------------------ Original ------------------

From:  "Ivar Grimstad"<ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;

Date:  Wed, Jun 2, 2021 03:07 PM

To:  "Jakarta specification discussions"<jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>;

Subject:  Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] BALLOT: Plan Review for Jakarta Servlet 6.0

 

+1 PMC

We should remove the links to empty artifacts on the 6.0.0 page after the PR has been merged, but that is a minor cosmetic issue

Ivar

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:12 AM marceloancelmo <marceloancelmo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Forgot to add BALLOT to the subject

Best Regards,

Marcelo Ancelmo

On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 22:15, marceloancelmo <marceloancelmo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.

I need your vote to approve the Plan Review of Jakarta Servlet 6.0

The JESP/EFSP states a Plan Review provides a means for the Specification Project Team to present their Release Plan to the Project Leadership Chain, the Specification Committee, and the community for feedback.  Also, the JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the Plan Review.

The relevant materials are available here:

https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/367

https://deploy-preview-367--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/

Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on Monday, Jun 7th , that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Red Hat, Tomitribe, and Primeton), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committee Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject).  Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

Best Regards,

Marcelo Ancelmo

Twitter: https://twitter.com/marceloancelmo

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/marceloancelmo/

SlideShare: https://www.slideshare.net/marceloancelmo

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec

--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec