Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] BALLOT: Plan Review for Jakarta XML Binding 4.0

["Kevin Sutter" <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx>]

+1 (IBM)

Via the PR, I
am asking Lukas to explicitly identify the proposed updates that are causing
the major version update.  Minor update to the Release Plan that does
not affect the desired content of the proposed release.

---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter 
STSM, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter

Part-time schedule: Tue, Wed, Thu (off on Mon and Fri)



From:
       marceloancelmo
<marceloancelmo@xxxxxxxxx>
To:
       Jakarta
specification discussions <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
       05/31/2021
15:01
Subject:
       [EXTERNAL]
[jakarta.ee-spec] BALLOT: Plan Review for Jakarta XML Binding 4.0
Sent
by:        "jakarta.ee-spec"
<jakarta.ee-spec-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>

---

Greetings Jakarta EE
Specification Committee.

I need your vote to
approve the Plan Review of Jakarta
XML Binding 4.0

The JESP/EFSP states
a Plan Review provides a means for the Specification Project Team to present
their Release Plan to the Project Leadership Chain, the Specification Committee,
and the community for feedback.  Also, the JESP/EFSP requires a successful
ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the Plan Review.

The relevant materials
are available here:

https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/357
https://deploy-preview-357--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/

Per the process, this
will be a seven-day ballot, ending on Monday, Jun 7th ,
that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee
members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only
votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee
is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies
(Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Red Hat, Tomitribe, and Primeton), along
with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committee
Members.

Specification Committee
representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1
(positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject).  Any feedback that you can
provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

Best Regards,
Marcelo Ancelmo
Twitter: https://twitter.com/marceloancelmo
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/marceloancelmo/
SlideShare: https://www.slideshare.net/marceloancelmo

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec