| Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [External] : Re: Updating spec pages (was: Fwd: [jakartaee/specifications] Nosql Status update (#333)) |
I agree that keeping the Spec. pages up to date is useful. I
didn't think there were specific compatibility criteria for
anything other than a final release but maybe I'm missing
something.
That said, if the consensus is, that this is a problem with
making updates to these pages, perhaps the Spec. pages just
indicate that work is proceeding and the project can publish
details as needed on a separate site -- for example, GH Pages.
The advantage to GH Pages is that the project team has complete control over these and may update them as they feel necessary.
If we were to agree with this, the Spec. page could list summary
abstract data and have a reference pointer to where the "latest
and greatest" details are located.
On Apr 8, 2021, at 2:01 PM, David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If we do allow specifications in development to be published [to jakarta.ee/specifications/] without a Progress Review, then it opens up the possibility that someone downloading and implementing it could be sued by a member of the Working Group.
Clarifying "published" in this context specifically refers to the jakarta.ee/specifications/ section of the website.
-David
_______________________________________________ jakarta.ee-spec mailing list jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!KGWfXP8MDVJ8GRPtZZOhD73SS34I4ZslJY0QKiaCHYG7cPi0JgbJY3dRdtcK7Vk$