Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] Does the EFSL license need to be in the javadocs d

[Ivar Grimstad <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxx>]

For this release, I think we should accept both (or all three) ways.

For future releases, we can create a common footer/template that all specs can use. 

Ivar

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 3:05 PM Scott Stark <starksm64@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In reviewing the BV javadocs, the footer statement is correct, but there is no link to an EFSL license file and there is no EFSL license content in the apidocs tree. Is there a requirement to have a link to a local file? Could we just be using a common external link to the https://www.eclipse.org/legal/efsl.php page?

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec