Good point Ian, I guess nobody every really looked closely at the original charter (including myself)...
Regards, Kai
Kai,
I don't see any mention of Associate members in the original
charter either, unless I've missed something. This doesn't change
the need to be clear in the new charter, but I am wondering if the
policy has actually changed. Ian
On 05/10/2017 03:28 PM, Kai Kreuzer
wrote:
Hi Ian,
Thanks for the feedback. If it wasn’t on purpose to
exclude Associate members then you might want to think about
changing the section about the „Participation Guidelines -
Membership“:
Member participants are required to:
- Be an Eclipse Foundation member at Strategic, Enterprise or Solution level.
Or did I misinterpret this statement?
Cheers,
Kai
Kai,
Good
point about the Associate members. I don’t see any
reason to expel OpenHab Foundation or any of the
existing Associate members. In the past, specific
Associate members have been invited to join and I
see that continuing.
Ian
I will abstain from voting as the new
charter actually means that associate members like
the openHAB Foundation are going to be expelled from
the iot-wg - hence it would feel weird to me to give
a +1 here.
The decision is fine for me though, if this
helps keeping the iot-wg focused and effective in
its actions, so no worries.
Kollwitzweg
10, 64372 Ober-Ramstadt, Germany
We are now in a position to
vote on the final version of the charter.
Each member company is asked to vote +1, 0
or -1. To vote, please respond to this email
thread. We will use a lazy consensus to
determine the final results. The voting will
end May 12 at 5pmPST. If you vote -1, it
would be appreciated if you give a reason.
Thank you again for all the
feedback and comments on the draft charter.
Please let me know if you
have any questions.
As discussed,
we are in the process to update the IoT
Working Group charter. At the last phone
call, I took the action item to document a
process for finalizing the new charter.
Therefore, I would like to proposed the
following:
2. After the
comments are closed, I will create a final
draft and post it on this mailing list. This
will be done before May 10.
3. We will then
conduct a lazy consensus vote of the working
group. Each member company will be asked to
vote, +1, -1 or 0. If there are no
objections by May 12, the charter will be
considered final. If you do have an
objection, I am hoping/expecting you will
have raised that objection before the vote. J
_______________________________________________
iot-wg
mailing list
iot-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To
change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg
_______________________________________________
iot-wg mailing list
iot-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg
--
Ian Craggs
icraggs@xxxxxxxxxx IBM United Kingdom
Eclipse Paho Project Lead; Committer on Eclipse Mosquitto;
Tech Lead in IBM Watson IoT Platform
_______________________________________________ iot-wg mailing list iot-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxTo change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg
|