Here are some more data models:
IPSO Smart Objects
OIC Resource Type Specification
W3C Web of Things Interest Group
On that subject, I’d like to remind everyone about the IAB sponsored workshop on IoT Semantic Interoperability coming up in March.
SL: "After we are able to exchange messages between Things and applications via communication protocols, how to "
understand and use" the messages from the Things in an interoperable fashion will become more and more important.”
Personally, I believe that hypermedia and the HATEOAS design style is our best hope for accommodating the diversity of data models, interaction models, and serializations that we are bound to deal with in the coming age of connected things.
I’m building a demonstration of an IoT system using HATEOAS based on a reference implementation of the Hypermedia Collection interface described in IETF CoRE Interfaces:
Cheers,
Michael
Hi Ian,
Can we ask developers about the IoT data model/API standards they are using (or expect to use)? After we are able to exchange messages between Things and applications via communication protocols, how to "understand and use" the messages from the Things in an interoperable fashion will become more and more important.
For example:
- What data model and web API standards do you use for your IoT solution? (Multiple selection)
- ISO 19156 Observation and Measurement
- OGC Sensor Web Enablement
- OGC SensorThings API
- OneM2M
- UCUM (The unified code for unit of measure)
- W3C JSON-LD
- W3C RDF
- W3C SSN (Semantic Sensor Networks)
- ... more here?
- Our own proprietary data model
My two cents.
Cheers,
Steve
_______________________________________________
iot-wg mailing list
iot-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxTo change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg