[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[iot-pmc] [CQ 21538] Eclipse zenoh initial contribution
|
http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21538
--- Comment #3 from Julien Enoch <julien.enoch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2020-02-04 08:54:32 ---
Hi PMC,
Few questions about the CQ for dependencies that we are preparing:
1) Should we wait for a +1 for this initial contribution before to issue the CQ
for dependencies ? (BTW what is the progress wrt. the review of his initial
contribution?)
3) Do we need CQ only for dependencies that are required by user at runtime
(i.e. when using our binaries) or also for dependencies that are used to build
our project, to test it, to benchmark it or to build its documentation (e.g.
CMake, Maven plugins, JUnit, Sphinx
) ?
2) We have more than 50 dependencies in various languages (OCaml, Java, Go,
Python).
Few could be piggybacked (mainly depending on result of CQ
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21517). Some will be «
work-with » dependencies (e.g. SQL client libs: we support either PostgreSQL,
SQLITE3 or MariaDB).
Shall we do 1 CQ per dependency, or can we group them ? If we group: either all
in 1 CQ or either 1 CQ per « category » (piggyback, work-with, prerequisite) ?
Thanks!
--
Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the CQ.
