[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[iot-pmc] [CQ 15736] node-wot@0.3.0
|
http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15736
--- Comment #9 from Jens Reimann <jreimann@xxxxxxxxxx> 2018-03-20 06:52:11 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > I just briefly checks the source code archive. My understanding is that this
> > content should become part of the project as an initial contribution.
>
> Yes, this CQ is an "initial" CQ and flagged accordingly. Maybe you are
> referring to having just one single CQ for the initial contribution as a whole,
> but I am not sure the IP team really cares? I will let them comment :-)
>
Oh that comment was related to the following, license topic. We had multiple
"initial" CQs in the past. So that shouldn't be any issue. But if this would
have been a dependency, then there would have been no need to sync the license
with the project license.
> > However the license is "W3C Software License", however the project records says
> > "The MIT License (MIT)". I also think that the license headers should be
> > adapted to reflect Eclipse (currently "Copyright (c) 2017 the thingweb
> > community").
> >
>
> The project's license will be W3C indeed. I believe the PMI is not correctly
> reflecting this at the moment.
>
> Agreed that the headers will need to be updated eventually.
>
--
Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the CQ.
