[iot-pmc] Simple +1 for previously accepted works-with dependencies

[Jens Reimann <jreimann@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi PMC,

please have a look at CQ14511 [1].

I overlooked that the PB CQ was actually a works-with dependency. However Sharon handled it as a PMC +1 due to the fact that we already discussed/voted on this dependency for another project.

I think this is a great approach and should make things a bit simpler.

So I would suggest to amend out PMC guidelines [2] if we agree on this process in general.

We could, at the same time fix up the section about discuss/vote since we are actually doing this no longer on the mailing list.

If that is ok with you I would like to write a diff in the guidelines pages so that we can vote on it.

Cheers

Jens

[1] https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14511
[2] https://wiki.eclipse.org/IoT/PMC

--

Jens Reimann
Senior Software Engineer / EMEA ENG Middleware
Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 14
85630 Grasbrunn
Germany
phone: +49 89 2050 71286
_____________________________________________________________________________

Red Hat GmbH, www.de.redhat.com,
Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Paul Argiry, Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill