[iot-pmc] [CQ 10199] OSGi Service Platform Core Companion Code Version:

[emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx]

http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10199





--- Comment #4 from Jan S. Rellermeyer <rellermeyer@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2015-10-06 13:49:19 ---
Kai, 

we have an approved CQ for using the code (CQ8093) and it is in our repository.
Since the core companion code is basically the API for an OSGi framework it
ships with our framework build.

In this CQ, I am basically asking for changing one utility class
(FrameworkUtils) from which user-provided bundles can request a RFC 1960 filter
instance. I agree that it is unusual to ask for modification of what is
basically a standardized API but the problem stems from OSGi actually shipping
an implementation of a filter and this is different from what we use internally
in Concierge.

What I am asking for is to remove the OSGi implementation and return our own
filter implementation instead to avoid redundancy and being able to provide
users with a better performance. It would not change the API and the behavior
of the filter implementation is specified and tested by the TCK so the user
would not experience any difference. 

Note that there is a second way for users to retrieve a filter outside this
convenience utility class (through the bundle context) and this one already
returns our own filter implementation.


-- 
Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the CQ.