Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [iot-pmc] Pre-Requisite request for libevent

Hm,

So it would be ok to just define it and write it down in the wiki? Is there a good reference in the wiki how this is written down?

Thanks for helping

Jens

On 09/02/2014 03:27 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
Other PMCs tend to use the standard one week of voting practice. We tend to be flexible with regard to the standard 3 x +1 requirement, however.

The Technology PMC approves many of these with only the initial pitch (usually by a PMC member; okay... usually me) and a +1 from any other PMC member. I believe that we're good-to-go if at least two PMC members are involved in the discussion.

HTH,

Wayne

On 02/09/14 06:19 AM, Kai Kreuzer wrote:
Ok, Jens just corrected me that this discussion is necessary in any case.
So I vote +1 and wonder what process we should agree on within the PMC to deal with such CQs?
Shall we:
- approve if there is no veto within 1 week?
- approve if at least x PMC members gave a +1?

What is a common practice within other PMCs?

Regards;
Kai


Am 02 Sep 2014 um 11:52 schrieb Kai Kreuzer <kai@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

Looks straight forward to me, I just added a +1.

Just to understand the process: Is it required to send e-mails to the PMC mailing list or should the PMC leads receive bugzilla notifications about pending CQs?

And under which conditions is a discussion necessary? From what I had learned so far is that pre-req CQs are actually seen less strict than other CQs, where no discussion is required. I am asking as I actually still have to create a pre-req request for my whole SmartHome target platform, which is pretty big…

Sorry, if this are stupid questions, but I am strill trying to get into the new role and welcome any mentoring.

Cheers,
Kai

Am 02 Sep 2014 um 11:23 schrieb Jens Reimann <jens.reimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Hello PMC,

the Eclipse SCADA Project would like to add "libevent" as a
pre-requisite. It is expected that the library is already on the user's
machine. Neither the source nor the binaries will be distributed.

This is the discussion for CQ8604 [1].

This request needs to be approved (+1).

Thanks

Jens

[1] https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8604
_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc
_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc
_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc


--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
EclipseCon Europe 2014


_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc



Back to the top