[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [incubation] Project downloads scanner
|
Hi Wayne
On 04/05/2016 04:34, Wayne Beaton wrote:
We have started work on a new version of the tool that will do a far
better job.
I am delighted that my projects have no RED but I think you are
encouraging a false sense of security since your tool's 'used' is
actually 'ever redistributed'.
In https://waynebeaton.wordpress.com/2011/09/09/is-a-cq-required/ 'used'
is 'directly referenced'.
So I expect to see Guava in RED since I haven't bothered to raise a
piggy-back CQ since versions change so often and I await the
auto-re-piggy-back of approved CQs. Last time I looked it appeared that
90% of projects that have an old Guava piggy-back CQ had not
re-piggy-backed.
In the specific case of Guava where dependencies are 12.0.0 to 19.0.0,
does that require 7 piggy-back CQs?
Re-piggy-back:
IMHO if Orbit has CQs for version X and Y, and a project has a
piggy-back CQ for X, then it has an auto-re-piggy-back for Y.
Regards
Ed Willink