Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [incquery-dev] incquery & xcore integration VS dynamic EMF mode

On Friday, June 21, 2013 at 5:56 PM, bergmann@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

However, I think it might invalidate one of my assumptions in this comment: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=398874#c21
You require query-based derived features in dynamic EMF models, although query-based derived features invariably use the managed EIQ engine, for which dynamic EMF mode is disabled.
Will "dynamic EMF mode" be required for such query-based Xcore derived features? If yes, then it should be enabled by default.

Probably not strictly required, but all of Xcore's demos use dynamic mode. So I guess we should make sure that we work with that setup "out of the box".
 

If both the model instance and the query is dynamically constructed, then there should not be an EPackage nsURI collision, so we should be fine. But I am thinking that if the Xcore classes extends previously defined EClasses (that are not dynamic but properly generated and registered), and the derived feature queries reuse patterns that were formulated on these registered supertype classes, then we may still have a problem. Can you find a flaw in this reasoning?


It is too hot for me to think about this right now :-)

Istvan 


--
Istvan RATH, PhD
Research fellow
Budapest University of Technology and Economics
Fault Tolerant Systems Research Group


Back to the top