Re: [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison

From: Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 10:26:19 -0400
Delivered-to: ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ide-dev>
List-help: <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ide-dev>, <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/ide-dev>, <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eclipse Foundation
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0

On 9/7/2016 10:20 AM, Eric Moffatt wrote:

In fact the 'Zero Latency' tests show that eclipse is in general faster than Intellij, why does nobody point this out ?

These types of statements are far stronger when coming from developers. So if you're waiting for the Eclipse Foundation to say it, that won't happen. We can help with getting articles placed, etc. but we cannot write the content.

--
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1.613.220.3223 (mobile)
@mmilinkov

References:
- [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison
  - From: Mickael Istria
- Re: [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison
  - From: Eric Moffatt

Prev by Date: Re: [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison
Next by Date: Re: [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison
Previous by thread: Re: [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison
Next by thread: Re: [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs