[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [iam-dev] Re: Problem depending on two versions of a bundle
|
No problem, I've placed the question.
http://www.eclipse.org/newsportal/article.php?id=778&group=eclipse.platform.pde#778
I'm not sure I've explained it properly, so if you feel like more
detail can be provided, please do so.
El 02/12/2008, a las 20:34, Carlos Sanchez escribió:
sorry, didnt have the time and most likely I wont in the next days :(
rolled back to 3.3
maybe the problem with lucene is incompatible ranges.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Abel Muiño Vizcaino
<amuino@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Another bit of information... our target platform contains two
versions of
javax.wsdl (1.4.0 and 1.5.1) and also two versions of
org.apache.commons.lang (2.3.0, 2.1.0).
For some reasin, it seems to only complain about lucene...
Weird!
El 02/12/2008, a las 20:10, Abel Muiño Vizcaino escribió:
I found this on the newsgroups:
http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.technology.equinox/msg01623.html
It states that two versions of a bundle can be active at the same
time (as
expected). This is according to the OSGi spec and is reported by
the equinox
team.
The problem must then be on our side or the PDE tooling... Carlos,
did you
get the time to report the problem to the PDE guys?
El 02/12/2008, a las 8:27, Abel Muiño Vizcaino escribió:
Carlos, can you forward the question to the PDE or Equinox teams?
It
should be possible to have a bundle installed with several
different
versions.
BTW: The target platform script only installs the bundles
required for
building (i.e. it lacks the UI part). It probably makes sense to
add those
(although not strictly required) for manual testing (maybe having
a separate
target platform for that?)
El 02/12/2008, a las 2:30, Carlos Sanchez escribió:
I have gone through all the setup and finally everything builds
fine
in eclipse.
Now the problems. If I try to run it as an eclipse application I
get
conflicting issues with lucene. Clicking on validate the
configuration
it says that org.eclipse.help.base needs lucene 1.9,2.0 and then
we
require 2.1,2.2, so even checking both lucene 1.9 and 2.1 it
doesnt
validate.
2008/12/1 Abel Muiño <amuino@xxxxxxxxx>
I'm on it :-)
We can not release 0.x versions without a release review, so it
will be
an snapshot or milestone.
BTW: we already missed M1 and M2 was scheduled on Dec 1, so it
seems
like we need to update the project plan.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:27 AM, Carlos Sanchez
<carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
if you were able to set it up already, can you publish a
developer
build?
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:27 AM, Abel Muiño Vizcaino
<amuino@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've set up a new "main" page for all the topics related to
setting a
development environment for IAM.
http://wiki.eclipse.org/IAM_Environment
This includes getting the source code and configuring the
target
platform
(currently 3.4) only.
http://wiki.eclipse.org/IAM_Getting_Sources
http://wiki.eclipse.org/IAM_Target_Platform
The part about the target platform is automated, although it
needs
some
love... for example versions of the dependencies are not
specified at
the
moment. I've marked this with TODOs on the wiki.
With a target platform in place, we should be closer to get
automated
builds
going.
--
Abel.
_______________________________________________
iam-dev mailing list
iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev
_______________________________________________
iam-dev mailing list
iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev
--
Abel Muiño - http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com/
_______________________________________________
iam-dev mailing list
iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev
_______________________________________________
iam-dev mailing list
iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev
_______________________________________________
iam-dev mailing list
iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev