> The patch you submitted also had two other authors; igo and garry. Can you
> help us to get in touch with them?
> Also, can you confirm that you are employed by Exist? That would make things
> a bit easier.
> Thanks!
>
> El 26/11/2008, a las 3:45, "Michael Hua" <
mhua@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:
>
> Hi Abel, the @author (mhua) & (venz) would be me. You could contact me
> through this email.
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:25 AM, Abel Muiño Vizcaino <
amuino@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> As we go through the full IP review at Eclipse, the legal team discovered
>> some authors who were not initially detected by us.
>> If you are one of the authors of the patches, we want to get in touch with
>> you! Without your consent we will not be able to use the patch in Eclipse
>> IAM.
>>
>> Currently, the affected issues are in this list:
>>
http://code.google.com/p/q4e/issues/list?can=1&q=label%3Aiam-ip-review
>> The @authors are:
>> (dmcneal)
>> * Contributor of a patch:
>>
http://code.google.com/p/q4e/issues/detail?id=99
>> * Included in r777
>>
http://code.google.com/p/q4e/source/detail?r=777
>>
>> (robdale, crdale)
>> * Contributor of a patch
>>
http://code.google.com/p/q4e/issues/detail?id=158
>> * Included in r796
>>
http://code.google.com/p/q4e/source/detail?r=796
>> (mhua)
>> * Contributor of a patch
>>
http://code.google.com/p/q4e/issues/detail?id=323
>> * Included in r1322
>>
http://code.google.com/p/q4e/source/detail?r=1322
>>
>> (igo, venz, garry)
>> * Contributors of a patch
>>
http://code.google.com/p/q4e/issues/detail?id=293
>> * Included in r1247
>>
http://code.google.com/p/q4e/source/detail?r=1247
>> (gbaal)
>> * Contributor of a patch
>>
http://code.google.com/p/q4e/issues/detail?id=336
>> * Included in r1309
>>
http://code.google.com/p/q4e/source/detail?r=1309
>> (if I already contacted you directly, sorry for the noise...)
>> --
>> Abel Muiño Vizcaino -
http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> No Name
> Ex-Employee | Exist Global | ? | Skype: ? |
www.exist.com | Innovation
> Delivered
>
> The fatal flaw in every plan is the assumption that you know more than your
> enemy.
>
>
>
> >
>
--