Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [hono-dev] Redundant(?) properties in API messages

If you are using the "link routing" then the target address must be specified.
In your case you should also see a "disposition" with "released" from the router.

By the way ... waiting for the guru ... Gordon ;)

Paolo Patierno
Senior Software Engineer (IoT) @ Red Hat
Microsoft MVP on Windows Embedded & IoT
Microsoft Azure Advisor 

Twitter : @ppatierno
Linkedin : paolopatierno
Blog : DevExperience


> From: Dominik.Guggemos@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: hono-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:22:36 +0000
> Subject: Re: [hono-dev] Redundant(?) properties in API messages
>
> Hi, this sounds great, but we can't get it working here.
>
> > Without that change, you could subscribe to telemetry.myTenant and get messages sent to telemetry.myTenant.aDevice, but that would not work if replaceing the '.' with a '/'. However that should soon be addressed.
>
> What we are doing:
> - running the Dispatch Router using the Docker image
> - create a receiver at address: telemetry.myTenant
> - send a message with to property (no target address specified for the sender link): telementry.myTenant.4711
>
> Last thing we see in the trace log is:
>
> ←[36mqdrouter_1 | ←[0mWed Apr 27 11:43:24 2016 MESSAGE (trace) Received Message{to='telemetry.myTenant.4711' body='\a1\0545645'} on link auto-0
>
> But it's not forwarded to the receiver. Should this work out-of-the-box? Or do we miss some further configuration? Maybe you have an idea what we are doing wrong?
>
> Dominik
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: hono-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:hono-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gordon Sim
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 11:46 AM
> To: hono-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [hono-dev] Redundant(?) properties in API messages
>
> On 27/04/16 10:15, Hudalla Kai (INST/ESY1) wrote:
> > HI,
> >
> > following up on the addressing scheme we started to discuss yesterday, we now seem to run into some (current) limitations of the Dispatch Router.
> >
> > Assume a protocol adapter that sends a telemetry message to Hono using
> > e.g. the following address for the message's "to" field: telemetry/myTenant/myDevice Hono will extract the tenant and device from the address and add the "tenant-id" and "device-id" message annotations to the message and then forward the message to the Dispatch Router.
> >
> > An application that wants to receive all telemetry data for tenant "myTenant" would create a receiver link with the Dispatch Router using source address "telemetry/myTenant". It seems that the Dispatch Router (currently?) has no way of configuring it to route all messages having an address starting with "telemetry/myTenant" to a receiver with a matching link source address, or does it?.
> >
> > @Gordon: Are we missing something here? Can the Dispatch Router be configured to support this (yet)?
>
> In 0.6.0-beta2, the delimiter for 'words' is the dot character, i.e.
> '.'. Since then there has been a change to recognise both '.' and '/', which will be part of the next beta or release candidate.
>
> Without that change, you could subscribe to telemetry.myTenant and get messages sent to telemetry.myTenant.aDevice, but that would not work if replaceing the '.' with a '/'. However that should soon be addressed.
>
> The other way to handle it is to use a sender per tenant in the hono 'proxy'. I.e. send messages over a sender with target telemetry/myTenant, and have the to field set to telemetry/myTenant/aDevice. (In this case the to field will not be used for routing at present). If you don't want to allow per device subscription, this would work fine.
>
> > On a sidenote: if we want to support assuming a DEFAULT_TENANT then we also need to make sure that the Dispatch Router understands this semantics as well, i.e. if an application creates a receiver with source address "telemetry/" then it must make sure that the application gets all messages having an address starting with "telemetry/DEFAULT_TENANT". Again, I have no clue if and how the Dispatch Router can support this ...
>
> It cannot support that. In the case there is a default tenant, would that be the *only* tenant?
>
> Can the hono proxy send the message to 'telemetry/'?
> _______________________________________________
> hono-dev mailing list
> hono-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/hono-dev
> _______________________________________________
> hono-dev mailing list
> hono-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/hono-dev

Back to the top