| Re: [higgins-dev] Original vs. Revised Access Control Policy Proposals |
Must be Notes that is doing this
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
Paul Trevithick ---07/01/2008 11:32:40 AM---Drat. I checked with 3 people and it worked for all 3, but clearly not you. So I’ll create a wiki page.
From:
Paul Trevithick <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
higgins-dev <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
07/01/2008 11:32 AM
Subject:
Re: [higgins-dev] Original vs. Revised Access Control Policy Proposals
Drat. I checked with 3 people and it worked for all 3, but clearly not you. So I’ll create a wiki page.
On 7/1/08 12:00 AM, "Anthony Nadalin" <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
pics/whatever did not come through
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
Paul Trevithick ---06/30/2008 08:45:39 PM---Jim,
From:
Paul Trevithick <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
To:
Jim Sermersheim <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> >
Cc:
higgins-dev <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> >
Date:
06/30/2008 08:45 PM
Subject:
[higgins-dev] Original vs. Revised Access Control Policy Proposals
Jim,
Since I wasn’t very clear in my previous email, I’ve created two slides that compare the old and the revised access control PolicyEntity proposals. First, the original proposal:
And here is the revised proposal:
-Paul_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev>
_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
