Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [higgins-dev] With 7 people having voted so far...

Everything is an Entity, so no replacements needed

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122

Inactive hide details for "Paul Trevithick" ---02/24/2008 10:01:54 PM---Anyone who votes for entity has the extra burden of sug"Paul Trevithick" ---02/24/2008 10:01:54 PM---Anyone who votes for entity has the extra burden of suggesting a second word to replace “real world”


From:

"Paul Trevithick" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

To:

"'Higgins \(Trust Framework\) Project developer discussions'" <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Cc:

<higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

02/24/2008 10:01 PM

Subject:

RE: [higgins-dev] With 7 people having voted so far...




Anyone who votes for entity has the extra burden of suggesting a second word to replace “real world” entities (like people, objects, organizations, software programs, etc.) that are being represented by a node-whatever.

From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Nadalin
Sent:
Sunday, February 24, 2008 5:43 PM
To:
Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions
Cc:
Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions; higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
Re: [higgins-dev] With 7 people having voted so far...

Open to everyone that votes for "entity"

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122

Inactive hide details for "Uppili Srinivasan" ---02/24/2008 04:34:15 PM---Is this voting a privilege for only the contributors "Uppili Srinivasan" ---02/24/2008 04:34:15 PM---Is this voting a privilege for only the contributors or can interested commons vote? :-)


From:

"Uppili Srinivasan" <uppili.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>

To:

"Higgins \(Trust Framework\) Project developer discussions" <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

02/24/2008 04:34 PM

Subject:

Re: [higgins-dev] With 7 people having voted so far...





Is this voting a privilege for only the contributors or can interested commons vote? :-)

----- Original Message -----

From:
Paul Trevithick
To:
'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'
Sent:
Sunday, February 24, 2008 12:11 PM
Subject:
RE: [higgins-dev] With 7 people having voted so far...

Sorry, should have been more clear about that. Yes, vote for more than one.


[Greg, if you find another computer/device with a different IP address, you can vote again and add your missing input. Let me know if that’s not good enough]

From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg Byrd
Sent:
Saturday, February 23, 2008 1:36 PM
To:
Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions
Subject:
Re: [higgins-dev] With 7 people having voted so far...

Hmm. Seven responders and 12 responses. I didn't know we could/should vote for more than one.

...Greg


_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev

GIF image

GIF image

GIF image

GIF image

GIF image


Back to the top