| Re: [higgins-dev] Proposed update to higgins.owl (aka HOWL) |
|
Why do we want to define specific node types in the core data model (higgins.owl)? Persons, Groups, and Organizations may not be at all represented in some Contexts. It seems like these belong in other optional/auxiliary owl specifications.
Attached is a proposed update to higgins.owl along with two example files. I’m keeping this out of the SVN until the 1.0.0 branch is done. The changes are summarized here: http://wiki.eclipse.org/HOWL_Update. Other than endless refactoring to align what we’re doing with best practices and other standards related to RDF, it includes experimental support for a proposed simple access control policy _expression_.
I have also attached a sample test person.owl ontology that a CP might use, and an example of simple instance data here: person-example.owl.
[Sergey this is the update that I mentioned I was working on today]
-Paul
|