Not seeing any value with IGF, we already have claims and policy that can express what IGF is supposed to be able to express, so maybe the IGF folks can just pickup what has been done with defining the claims.
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
<graycol.gif>"Jim Sermersheim" ---11/28/2007 02:45:24 PM---To try and push ahead on fleshing out what it would take to consume Higgins by the IGF, or implement parts of it in Higgins, we
<ecblank.gif>
From: | <ecblank.gif>
"Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> |
<ecblank.gif>
To: | <ecblank.gif>
<higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
<ecblank.gif>
Date: | <ecblank.gif>
11/28/2007 02:45 PM |
<ecblank.gif>
Subject: | <ecblank.gif>
[higgins-dev] Notes from a teleconf meeting wrt IGF |
To try and push ahead on fleshing out what it would take to consume Higgins by the IGF, or implement parts of it in Higgins, we had a chat on the phone with Phil Hunt. Primarily, the call was geared toward sharing descriptions of architecture (understanding how IdAS works and understanding the IGF architecture).
I put notes here http://wiki.eclipse.org/20071128_IGF_teleconf_notes
which are pointed at from here http://wiki.eclipse.org/IGF_Integration
which is pointed at from here http://wiki.eclipse.org/Identity_Attribute_Service
I'll start a new thread (continuing an old one) on Idas API extensibility which was one of the work items that came from the call.
Jim _______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
<graycol.gif><ecblank.gif>_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
