[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [higgins-dev] Breaking changes to IdAS for switch to Java 1.4
|
Jim,
Where can I see these changes you made to STS?
Thanks,
Mike
higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 03/21/2007 02:25:08 AM:
> You mean, announcing and checking in on the same day might not be
> enough time for component owners to review and give feedback? I
> agree, this was a special circumstance. I already thwarted chaos by
> making Mike's (extremely trivial) changes for him.
>
> Normally, I do this:
> 1) Talk about and gather consensus regarding a change.
> 2) Implement the agreed-upon change (may take days or weeks).
> 3) Announce that the change is ready and will be checked in after a
> day or two.
> 4) Barring any further contention, check in after waiting the
> announced number of days.
>
> This time, I made the time period in step three less than 24 hours.
> Step 1 was begun two weeks ago on the list and Mike and others
> already gave feedback that resulted in the changes below (messages:
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/higgins-dev/msg01752.html,
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/higgins-dev/msg01754.html,
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/higgins-dev/msg01759.html, and
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/higgins-dev/msg01760.html)
>
> So, I'm giving step 3 another day at Tony's prompting. Does anyone
> have issues with the changes below? It would be best (I believe)
> for these to be checked in asap so component owners don't have to
> make unnecessary repeated trips through their code. I consider
> silence consent.
>
> Jim
>
> >>> Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx> 3/20/07 7:39 PM >>>
> Tom, I expect that the changes be cleared with the component owner
> first, they review the changes before anyone commits, this is how
> most all the Eclipse projects work, So yes this can get very chaotic
> if we don't get some serialization
>
> Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
> [image removed] "Tom Doman" <TDoman@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> "Tom Doman" <TDoman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent by: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 03/20/2007 05:40 PM
>
> Please respond to
> "Higgins \(Trust Framework\) Project developer discussions"
> <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> [image removed]
> To
>
> [image removed]
> <higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> [image removed]
> cc
>
> [image removed]
> <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> [image removed]
> Subject
>
> [image removed]
> Re: [higgins-dev] Breaking changes to IdAS for switch to Java 1.4
>
> [image removed]
>
> [image removed]
>
>
> Tony,
>
> I think Jim's e-mail IS the announcement to all component owners.
> Also, as Jim said below "I've already made the appropriate changes
> in the JNDI CP and in the STS components". Doesn't look all that
> chaotic to me.
>
> Tom
>
> >>> Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx> 03/20/07 4:21 PM >>>
>
>
>
>
>
> You should check with the component owners before you check in code,
like
> Mike for the STS, otherwise it will be chaos
>
> Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
>
>
>
> "Jim Sermersheim"
> <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx
> > To
> Sent by: <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> higgins-dev-bounc cc
> es@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject
> Re: [higgins-dev] Breaking changes
> 03/20/2007 09:33 to IdAS for switch to Java 1.4
> AM
>
>
> Please respond to
> "Higgins \(Trust
> Framework\)
> Project developer
> discussions"
> <higgins-dev@ecli
> pse.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Javadoc is at
> http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/org.eclipse.higgins.docs/idas/
>
> >>> "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> 3/20/07 8:03 AM >>>
> The following changes will be checked in today unless someone has a
> problem with them:
>
>
> * IdAS
> * All Iterable<> arguments and return values change to Iterator
> * All List<> arguments and return values change to Iterator
> ** Replace IRelationship<URI> with IContextRelationship
> ** IContext.buildRelationship now returns an IContextRelationship
>
> * JNDI CP fixes to conform to IdAS changes
>
> * STS fixes to conform to IdAS changes
>
> The reason I want to check these in now rather than wait a few days is
> because I've already made the appropriate changes in the JNDI CP and in
> the STS components, and all other affected component are already broken
> from the last set of changes -- they may as well work through these at
the
> same time.
>
> Jim_______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
