Re: [higgins-dev] Re: Proposed Version 1: Higgins based LDAP OWL ontolog

[Mark Wahl <Mark.Wahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mark Wahl wrote:

Sorry, cut and paste error near the end of the first para - should have read

> I would have expected that a version 1 of an ontology proposed as the
> Higgins base LDAP OWL ontology should use as a basis for definition
> either the most recent standards-track LDAP schema, as defined in the
> IETF LDAP RFCs, or the schema elements published in the IANA LDAP
> registry, and not just the LDAP schema of a specific implementation
> which differs from both of the above, since there isn't a 
> consensus-building process for whether a schema element is present
> in your server.


Mark Wahl
Informed Control Inc.