| RE: [higgins-dev] Re: Proposed Version 1: Higgins based LDAP OWL ontology |
That worked, thanks Paul. Now, baring generator defects, we should get OWL-DL output from any LDAP server whose schema is consistent. -Tom >>> "Paul Trevithick" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 10/1/2006 7:10 AM >>> Tom wrote: > > Yep. I'm exercising "garbage in, garbage out" on that one for now. The > LDAP server I'm getting that from is a simple test server that doesn't > even validate entries against the schema anyway. > > FWIW, the third and last one is ... > > A supposed "Unknown Resource" error on my owl import statement. It's > weird because it DOES find and display all the Higgins ontology and (after > "fixing" the & problem) the relationships between the generated > ontology and the Higgins ontology. Here's what SemanticWorks says isn't > OWL-DL: > > Invalid OWL DL syntax in owl:imports-statement: <http://www.bandit- > project.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/ldap> owl:imports > <http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins.owl> > Unknown Resource > <http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins.owl>. In OWL DL a > type for every individual is mandatory (beside 'owl:DeprecatedClass' or > 'owl:DeprecatedProperty'). > Try adding this line: <owl:Ontology rdf:about="http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins.owl"/> -Paul _______________________________________________ higgins-dev mailing list higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev