[gmf-dev] Test of patch for bug 233344 "Tree Style routing problem with

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[gmf-dev] Test of patch for bug 233344 "Tree Style routing problem with Packages"

From: "Robert Green" <rgreen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:18:13 -0700
Delivered-to: gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/gmf-dev>
List-help: <mailto:gmf-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev>, <mailto:gmf-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev>, <mailto:gmf-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: Acmj/7CGzSuh/SomTh+IoZhZBkkr6Q==
Thread-topic: Test of patch for bug 233344 "Tree Style routing problem with Packages"

Hello all,

I have been testing the recently suggested patch to bug 233344 “Tree Style routing problem with Packages” and would like to provide some feedback. Would this be the most appropriate place to contribute or would it be more appropriate to go through the main gmf newsgroup?

Thanks

Rob Green.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [gmf-dev] Test of patch for bug 233344 "Tree Style routing problem with Packages"
  - From: Richard Gronback

Prev by Date: Re: [gmf-dev] Using Borland Together FSMs with GMF
Next by Date: Re: [gmf-dev] Test of patch for bug 233344 "Tree Style routing problem with Packages"
Previous by thread: [gmf-dev] Using Borland Together FSMs with GMF
Next by thread: Re: [gmf-dev] Test of patch for bug 233344 "Tree Style routing problem with Packages"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs