Re: [gmf-dev] How to represent aggregation like in UML diagrams

[flob <florin.botis@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi, Thanks for the reply!

    I've posted the question on the GMF newsgroup but no one has answered
:(.
Yes I'm referring to strong aggregation . I need just a simple example about
how to generate an editor for 2 nodes A and B, where A aggregates B.I
searched for phantom nodes in google but It seems that i can't find any
useful information. If you can give me some advice on how to do this thing
I'll be very happy.

Best Regards,
                 Florin Botis



Richard Gronback wrote:
> 
> Please post questions like this to the GMF newsgroup
> (eclipse.modeling.gmf).
> You might consider searching Google for "eclipse GMF phantom" as it's
> possible to use a link to represent a containment reference (so-called
> "phantom" nodes).  I'm assuming you mean strong aggregation (aka
> composition).
> 
> - Rich
> 
> 
> On 7/30/08 8:10 AM, "flob" <florin.botis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>>   I wonder how i can represent the aggregation in my GMF application to
>> look
>> like in classical UML diagrams. Now the aggregation is represented with a
>> compartment, but I want to represent links (connections) between classes
>> and
>> I don't know if it is possible and if yes how.
>>    For example I want to represent that A aggregates B like this
>> A<>--------------B.
>> 
>>   I have a big xsd file witch represents the model , and the only
>> relations
>> in the model are aggregate relations. If I will represent the aggregation
>> with compartments it will be very difficult for the user to manipulate
>> deep
>> nodes.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks in advance!
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gmf-dev mailing list
> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-represent-aggregation-like-in-UML-diagrams-tp18648258p18732693.html
Sent from the Eclipse GMF - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.