Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [gmf-dev] Feature versions for Ganymede release

> Perhaps we should eliminate feature-level dependencies and switch to just plug-ins? http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Version_Numbering#To_Require_Features_or_To_Require_Bundles

Hi Richard, given the platform did not do this I suppose we should not. (JDT and PDE are still using requires feature org.eclipse.platform in 3.4).

Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
IBM Rational Software: Aurora / GMF / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-270-4613


Inactive hide details for Richard Gronback ---05/01/2008 03:11:38 PM---Thanks. I forgot to include the experimental SDK, which Richard Gronback ---05/01/2008 03:11:38 PM---Thanks. I forgot to include the experimental SDK, which looks like it should go from


From:

Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To:

"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

05/01/2008 03:11 PM

Subject:

Re: [gmf-dev] Feature versions for Ganymede release




Thanks.

I forgot to include the experimental SDK, which looks like it should go from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0.

Perhaps we should eliminate feature-level dependencies and switch to just plug-ins?
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Version_Numbering#To_Require_Features_or_To_Require_Bundles

- Rich


On 5/1/08 11:55 AM, "Anthony Hunter" <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
      Hi Richard,

      Yes the list looks good.

      I completed
      https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=170821 for the plug-ins but did not do the features. (i.e. the required features in all our feature.xml also need their version updated (gef 3.4.0 from 3.3.0, etc.).

      Cheers...
      Anthony
      --
      Anthony Hunter
      mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
      Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
      IBM Rational Software: Aurora / GMF / Modeling Tools
      Phone: 613-270-4613


      Richard Gronback ---05/01/2008 09:18:53 AM---Hi, I'd like to update our feature versions to correspond with the included


      From:

      Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>

      To:

      "GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

      Date:

      05/01/2008 09:18 AM

      Subject:

      [gmf-dev] Feature versions for Ganymede release




      Hi,

      I'd like to update our feature versions to correspond with the included
      plug-in/feature changes. As far as I can tell, they should be:

      Feature Present Becomes Comment
      doc 1.2.0 --- Already done with 229015
      tooling 2.0.1 2.1.0 Included plug-in minor service increment
      thirdparty 1.1.0 --- Already incremented
      runtime 1.1.0 --- Already incremented
      sdk 2.0.1 2.1.0 Due to increment of included feature
      examples 1.1.0 --- No change required
      notation 1.1.0 --- New feature

      Look right? Are there any pending changes coming that would impact this
      numbering, or are we good to make these changes for the Ganymede release?

      Thanks,
      Rich

      _______________________________________________
      gmf-dev mailing list
      gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
      https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev




      _______________________________________________
      gmf-dev mailing list
      gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
      https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev_______________________________________________
      gmf-dev mailing list
      gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
      https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev


GIF image

GIF image

GIF image

GIF image


Back to the top