Re: [gmf-dev] Feature versions for Ganymede release

[Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Title: Re: [gmf-dev] Feature versions for Ganymede release

Not sure I follow you... Maybe you read “package” instead of “feature” below?

The idea is to have plug-ins listed on a feature’s dependency list, instead of other features.

Best,
Rich


On 5/1/08 3:46 PM, "Mindaugas Idzelis" <idzelis@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Question....

If you are requiring a "package" instead of a "plugin" how are extension points resolved? I thought only "plugins" had the concept of an extension point. If you start modifying your plugin to depend on just all the packages that it needs, I don't think the extensions it contributes to will work.


Thanks,

Mindaugas Idzelis


Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 05/01/2008 03:06 PM

Please respond to
"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To

"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

cc
Subject

Re: [gmf-dev] Feature versions for Ganymede release




Scratch that.  The experimental SDK is already at 1.1.1 and looks OK.


On 5/1/08 2:59 PM, "Richard Gronback" <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks.

I forgot to include the experimental SDK, which looks like it should go from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0.

Perhaps we should eliminate feature-level dependencies and switch to just plug-ins?  http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Version_Numbering#To_Require_Features_or_To_Require_Bundles <http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Version_Numbering#To_Require_Features_or_To_Require_Bundles>

- Rich


On 5/1/08 11:55 AM, "Anthony Hunter" <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Richard,

Yes the list looks good.

I completed https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=170821 <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=170821> for the plug-ins but did not do the features. (i.e. the required features in all our feature.xml also need their version updated (gef 3.4.0 from 3.3.0, etc.).

Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
IBM Rational Software: Aurora / GMF / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-270-4613


Richard Gronback ---05/01/2008 09:18:53 AM---Hi, I'd like to update our feature versions to correspond with the included


From:
Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To:
"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:
05/01/2008 09:18 AM

Subject:
[gmf-dev] Feature versions for Ganymede release

---

Hi,

I'd like to update our feature versions to correspond with the included
plug-in/feature changes.  As far as I can tell, they should be:

Feature     Present     Becomes     Comment
doc         1.2.0       ---        Already done with 229015
tooling     2.0.1       2.1.0      Included plug-in minor service increment
thirdparty  1.1.0       ---        Already incremented
runtime     1.1.0       ---        Already incremented
sdk         2.0.1       2.1.0      Due to increment of included feature
examples    1.1.0       ---        No change required
notation    1.1.0       ---        New feature

Look right?  Are there any pending changes coming that would impact this
numbering, or are we good to make these changes for the Ganymede release?

Thanks,
Rich

_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev>

---

_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev> _______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev>

---

_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev