[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [gmf-dev] Bi-weekly call agenda
|
To me, 3.0 or any other 'release after the next one' is ok. Just need to denote that it's not planned for the next release. Though, the risk noone ever reviews these is high, but 3.0 seems to became an 'obstacle' some day and to me it's reasonable to use release number instead of 'future' term.
Relying on component as indicator 'not processed' is not to my liking as it might not be always possible to assign specific person right away, and component inbox is reasonable default.
Artem
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Gronback
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 3:55 PM
> To: GMF Project developer discussions.
> Subject: Re: [gmf-dev] Bi-weekly call agenda
>
> I guess the problem I have with something like "future" is
> that it feels a lot like the RESOLVED/LATER problem we have
> agreed to not do at Eclipse anymore. Who will look at them again?
>
> It seems you're happy with the 2.1 and milestones, plus a 3.0 target.
> Artem, seem OK to you?
>
> Thanks,
> Rich
>
>
> On 6/19/07 9:37 AM, "Anthony Hunter" <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Agreed, Perhaps we should add the target milestone "Future". Other
> > components have "Future".
> >
> > Then we can bulk move to Future:
> >
> > "Did not make 2.0, moving to a future release. Originator should
> > comment or change the priority if the request is critical
> in nature".
> >
> > Cheers...
> > Anthony
> > --
> > Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx Software Development
> > Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components IBM Rational
> Software: Aurora
> > / Modeling Tools
> > Phone: 613-591-7037
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: "Artem Tikhomirov" <Artem.Tikhomirov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > To: "GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Date: 19/06/2007 09:30 AM
> >
> > Subject RE: [gmf-dev] Bi-weekly call agenda
> > :
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > '---' is not very handy - newly submitted requests get it
> by default
> > and it's just inconvenient to see both 'later' and 'not yet
> processed'
> > in the same list.
> >
> > Artem
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Gronback
> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 1:31 PM
> >> To: GMF Project developer discussions.
> >> Subject: Re: [gmf-dev] Bi-weekly call agenda
> >>
> >> I added 2.0.1 and 2.0.2
> >>
> >> The 'future' milestone is usually indicated with '---'.
> I'm not sure
> >> what other kind of milestone we could set, or if we even should.
> >> Ideas?
> >>
> >> - Rich
> >>
> >>
> >> On 6/19/07 5:22 AM, "Artem Tikhomirov"
> >> <Artem.Tikhomirov@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I suggest we add 2.0.x target milestones to Bugzilla and
> >> perhaps some
> >>> kind of 'future' milestone to denote requests that are not
> >> planned for
> >>> next release but helpwanted/may be considered later. Bulk
> >> move to 2.1
> >>> is easy but not that sensible ;)
> >>>
> >>> Artem
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> [mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Richard Gronback
> >>>> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 11:57 PM
> >>>> To: GMF Project developer discussions.
> >>>> Subject: Re: [gmf-dev] Bi-weekly call agenda
> >>>>
> >>>> Let's all try to cleanup Bugzilla, then we'll have a
> clear view of
> >>>> what's left. I'm traveling this evening, but will try to sync
> >>>> Deskzilla and run through all those still in 2.0/RCM7.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sure, if you have some for 2.0 you'd like to discuss on the call
> >>>> tomorrow, please list on the wiki. If there are none
> >> listed, we'll
> >>>> know not to dial in.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Rich
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 6/18/07 8:58 AM, "Anthony Hunter" <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Maybe we should list the Bugzillas we plan to do for
> the release?
> >>>>> Should we do this today?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers...
> >>>>> Anthony
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx Software Development
> >>>>> Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components IBM Rational
> >>>> Software: Aurora
> >>>>> / Modeling Tools
> >>>>> Phone: 613-591-7037
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> From: Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To: "GMF Project developer discussions."
> >> <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Date: 18/06/2007 06:52 AM
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Subject [gmf-dev] Bi-weekly call agenda
> >>>>> :
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is there anything to discuss this time, or are we all set
> >>>> to build 2.0?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/GMF_Dev_Calls
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Rich
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Richard C. Gronback
> >>>>> Borland Software Corporation
> >>>>> richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> +1 860 227 9215_______________________________________________
> >>>>> gmf-dev mailing list
> >>>>> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> gmf-dev mailing list
> >>>>> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Richard C. Gronback
> >>>> Borland Software Corporation
> >>>> richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> +1 860 227 9215
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> gmf-dev mailing list
> >>>> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> gmf-dev mailing list
> >>> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
> >>
> >> --
> >> Richard C. Gronback
> >> Borland Software Corporation
> >> richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> +1 860 227 9215
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gmf-dev mailing list
> >> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > gmf-dev mailing list
> > gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gmf-dev mailing list
> > gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>
> --
> Richard C. Gronback
> Borland Software Corporation
> richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
> +1 860 227 9215
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmf-dev mailing list
> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>
