Hi Anthony,
As far as I can see in CVS, you are changing the MANIFEST.MF's to
1.0.100.qualifier in the maintenance branch (R1_0_maintenance) whereas
to my best understanding, plugins which get bugfixes should become
1.0.1.qualifier in the maintenance branch, and 1.0.100.qualifier in the
HEAD. And this guarantees that the plugins from the next major version
(version 2.0) with these fixes will for sure override ones from the
maintenance release (1.0.1/1.0.2) in the user configuration.
Below is the excerpt from the document you were referring:
-cut-
Example: At the end of the development stream N, the version of the
plug-in P is 2.4.8. When P receives its first bug fix in the development
stream N+1 or higher, then the version should be changed to 2.4.108.
If P version 2.4.8 needs to receive a bug fix in the maintenance
stream started from N, then its version number will be 2.4.9.
-cut-
In our case, the development stream (N+1 = 2.0) is in HEAD, the
maintenance stream is in R1_0_maintenance branch.
Am I missing something?
Best regards,
Max
Anthony Hunter wrote:
Hi All,
A quick note as per http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Version_Numbering
Second development stream
- 1.0.100 (indicates a bug fix)
We have been changing the MANIFEST.MF to 1.0.100.qualifier in plug-ins we
fix a bug in.
Cheers...
Anthony
Richard Gronback
<richard.gronback
@borland.com> To
Sent by: "GMF Project developer
gmf-dev-bounces@e discussions."
clipse.org <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, GMF Release
List <gmf-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
06/29/2006 06:13
PM Subject
Re: [gmf-dev] CVS: GMF release
state tagged, maintenance branch
Please respond to is created
"GMF Project
developer
discussions."
<gmf-dev@eclipse.
org>
Thanks, Max.
Everyone should read and understand this document regarding versioning,
paying particular attention to the service segment guidelines:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Version_Numbering
Basically, no API breakage, new APIs or features, visible changes, etc. can
be made. Only bug fixes.
The Callisto maintenance stream was a topic at the Planning Council meeting
this week, we agreed to target 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 releases to be coincident
with Callisto's. The exact dates will be published, and should align with
normal platform maintenance releases at end-September and Q107.
Thanks everyone,
Rich
On 6/29/06 1:01 PM, "Max Feldman" <mfeldman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello team,
- org.eclipse.gmf project release state is tagged with "R1_0" in CVS;
- new branch "R1_0_maintenance" is created for the maintenance dev
stream.
Best regards,
Max
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
--
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
|