RE: [gmf-dev] Build I20060227-1730 posted

[Anthony Hunter <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Richard,

I have the opposite opinion in that
if our clients are downloading integration drivers, then I want to be on
these targets "kicking the tires" before they are. 
So if we move the weekly I-build to
a configuration, then I want that configuration too. 

"doesn’t
force us to fix weekly I-build breakages immediately".
So we do not automatically push these drivers to our clients?

Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Manager - Software Developer, 
IBM Rational Software: Aurora Core Common / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-591-7037

"Richard Gronback" <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

03/01/2006 07:26 AM

Please respond to
"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [gmf-dev] Build I20060227-1730 posted

Hi Anthony,
 
I think you lost me.  Currently,
we configure a new target weekly (typically Thursday) that is made up of
Platform/EMF/GEF/EMFT weekly I-builds.  Once built, we all move to
this target configuration (this was agreed to for the M5 period).
 
Previously, we had a stable
(last milestone of each) target used for nightly and continuous builds,
with a weekly I-build that used the config mentioned above.  We also
ran a nightly build using the I-build config.
 
I’d recommend we move back
to the previous schedule, which allows for a more stable dev target and
doesn’t force us to fix weekly I-build breakages immediately.
 
Thanks,
Rich

---

From: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Hunter
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 11:40 AM
To: GMF Project developer discussions.
Subject: Re: [gmf-dev] Build I20060227-1730 posted
 

Hi Richard, 

Currently: 
Eclipse declares a new Integration build for the week we adopt the latest
integration builds for Eclipse + EMF + GEF + EMFT (not 100% sure which
day this is done, but I think it is Thursday).
Once we have a working / approved GMF integration build we move these targets
back to the nightly builds and developers adopt as their new target.

I think we want to switch to the nightly build and developers running on
a target for a week before using them for the GMF integration builds. This
way we have a period of time to test and fix JUnit failures. 

Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Manager - Software Developer, 
IBM Rational Software: Aurora Core Common / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-591-7037

"Richard Gronback" <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

02/27/2006 06:58 PM

Please respond to
"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	<gmf-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc	gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject	[gmf-dev] Build I20060227-1730 posted

 

http://download.eclipse.org/technology/gmf/downloads/drops/I-I20060227-200602271730/index.php
  
Note the updated dependencies (Platform 3.2M5a, EMF/GEF/EMFT M5) and some
test failures. 
  
Are we OK to switch back to stable configurations for nightly builds, or
should we stick with weekly updates to the latest I-build in our dev environments?
  
Also, a new Linux build machine is being configured in Prague and will
be managed by Max Feldman, who returns to GMF after a period away.  This
should eliminate our connection timeout errors and path limit problems.
  
Thanks, 
Rich_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev