RE: [gmf-dev] This weeks integration build target ...

[Vishwanath Ramaswamy <vramaswa@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Richard,
We are working on getting EMFT nightly
builds in place soon. Thanks
Vish

"Richard Gronback" <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

01/25/2006 03:39 PM

Please respond to
"GMF Project developer discussions."

To	"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [gmf-dev] This weeks integration build target ...

I don’t see that EMFT builds
nightly (well, at least posted).
 
Another possibility for I-builds
nightly is to get them from here: http://gmf-dev.borland.com/cruisecontrol/buildresults/integration,
as we already perform a nightly build using the latest integration targets,
along with our “official” nightly builds using the stable target.
 
Any more votes?
 
Thanks,
Rich

---

From: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Artem Tikhomirov
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 12:34 PM
To: gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gmf-dev] This weeks integration build target ...
 
-1 to switch to integration builds
as targets for N builds. 
 
  Integration build (well,
the "intergration" term itself :) justifies for me some extra
work to do to set it up and make appropriate changes in the code. "nightly"
is a mere wrap-up for the day, and it seems reasonable to target it same
build most of us use as 'target platform' for development. I'm not sure
everyone updates it's target platform each week (personally I don't do
this, and nobody I'm aware of does). In addition, none of our dependencies
(except EMFT) seems to change that rapidly in API part for us to strive
to target latest I builds instead of M. 
 
  As an ultimate reason :)),
we should benefit GMF is +2 project, and grasping hot I builds for me sounds
somewhat contradictiuos ;).
 
  With current approach,
I builds serve as an indicator to put some dedicated efforts to deal with
issues and justify installing new target (equal to one used in I build)
and cheching against it. Besides, I build will warn you about possible
"end-of-milestone crunch"
(simply failing) so it's up to developer to handle these issues as soon
as he could. 
 
 
 As for EMFT, is it possible
to target their N builds in our nightly builds?
 
Best wishes,
Artem Tikhomirov

---

From: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Frederic Plante
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 7:59 PM
To: GMF Project developer discussions.
Cc: GMF Project developer discussions.; gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gmf-dev] This weeks integration build target ...

I vote for picking up the latest integration build, this allows us to stay
current and avoids end-of-milestone crunch to adapt to new milestone builds.
Also, not having a weekly drop for EMFT components may prove to be very
difficult as we move to EMFT components as target.

    Thanks

       - Fred

_________________________________
Frédéric Plante
Rational Software, IBM Software Group

"Richard Gronback" <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

01/25/2006 12:09 PM

Please respond to
"GMF Project developer discussions."

To	"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [gmf-dev] This weeks integration build target ...

 

Hi Steve, 
  
The current philosophy on our target configs for continuous and integration
builds is to utilize the most recent stable builds.  This is based
on the assumption that developers are using these for their dev environments,
so the two are matched.  This makes the most sense to me, and would
otherwise require we update our dev targets weekly, or live with the understanding
our dev target is different than our continuous/nightly builds (not a good
idea, imo).   
  
Of course, there may be some issues that may force an update, but those
you list don’t seem too critical.
  
So, let’s take a vote! 
  
Thanks, 
Rich

 

---

From: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Steven Shaw
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 8:42 AM
To: gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gmf-dev] This weeks integration build target ...
  

Hello Rich, 

I was wondering if we could update the nightly build targets to match this
weeks integration build targets?  We have a couple of bugzillas that
are blocked until the nightly build targets are updated...

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=124715
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=125158

Regards, 

Steve. 
________________________________________
Steven R. Shaw
Rational Modeling Platform Diagram Layer Lead
Rational Software | IBM Software Group
770 Palladium Drive, Kanata, ON, Canada, K2V 1C8
tel: 613.591.7979
steveshaw@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev