Thanks Anthony.
I’ll update the feature.xml to
include this plug-in. In case not everyone realizes it, when adding a
test plug-in, the required tasks are outlined here: http://www.eclipse.org/gmf/development/development_guidelines.html#Testing
Of course, this not being a JUnit plug-in means it only needs to go in
the feature.xml and have a map file entry.
I notice another plug-in was added, but is
commented out: o.e.g.tests.runtime.emf.clipboard.core. The tests seem to
run OK, but is not included in the build… Can I add it,
Vishy?
Best,
Rich
From:
gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Hunter
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005
1:19 PM
To: GMF
Project developer discussions.
Subject: Re: [gmf-dev] new
Integration build
Hi Richard,
We
just added org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.common.ui.services.provider which is a
plug-in used by org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.common.ui to test delayed plug-in
loading when loading service providers (Bug 112797) and handling provider exceptions
(114759).
I
updated the tests map file, let me know if it is OK.
Note
that org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.common.ui.services.provider is not a JUnit
tests plugin, as indicated by a comment in it's AllTests:
public class AllTests {
/**
* The org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.common.ui.services.provider
tests
* plug-in is not a JUnit test plug-in. This plug-in is used by
* org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.common.ui for
ProviderPolicyExceptionsTest
* and ProviderPolicyTest.
*/
}
Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Manager - Software Developer,
IBM Rational Software: Aurora Core Common / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-591-7037
"Richard Gronback"
<Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent
by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
11/07/2005 04:07 PM
Please
respond to
"GMF Project developer discussions."
<gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
To
|
"GMF Project
developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
"GMF Release List"
<gmf-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
[gmf-dev] new Integration build
|
|
Hi All,
I have
rebuilt and posted the latest integration build with process affinity set to
just one of the machine’s CPUs to test a theory regarding our test hangs.
It seems to have worked, as all tests passed with no hangups J.
Also, I wanted to test our build procedure for repeated builds using tag
I20051106-0900.
http://download.eclipse.org/technology/gmf/downloads/drops/I-I20051107-200511071200/index.php
Thanks,
Rich
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev