Re: [git] Nebula plans of moving to git

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [git] Nebula plans of moving to git

From: Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:22:56 -0500
Delivered-to: git@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/git>
List-help: <mailto:git-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/git>, <mailto:git-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/git>, <mailto:git-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 11:48 -0500, John Arthorne wrote:
> I would only considering breaking up a repository if it becomes
> physically too large to manage, or requires different committer
> permissions for different parts of the project. 

+1.  And yes, things are working out quite well in Linux Tools (and will
be even better in the future as we align the components more).

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [git] Nebula plans of moving to git
  - From: Wim Jongman

References:
- [git] Nebula plans of moving to git
  - From: Wim Jongman
- Re: [git] Nebula plans of moving to git
  - From: Mickael Istria
- Re: [git] Nebula plans of moving to git
  - From: Wim Jongman
- Re: [git] Nebula plans of moving to git
  - From: John Arthorne

Prev by Date: Re: [git] Nebula plans of moving to git
Next by Date: Re: [git] Nebula plans of moving to git
Previous by thread: Re: [git] Nebula plans of moving to git
Next by thread: Re: [git] Nebula plans of moving to git
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs