[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [geomesa-users] International date line dilemma for non-point geometries, possible bug?
|
Beau,
Good catch. We are looking into this now.
I'll get back to you with some guidance and, if this turns out to be a
bug, a JIRA tracking ticket.
thanks,
Hunter
On 06/20/2014 02:17 PM, Beau Lalonde wrote:
Hi,
I currently use GeoMesa to index non-point geometries (e.g. LineString, Polygon, MultiPoint), and I have recently switched from using a January version of GeoMesa to using a version that is current (as of the last week or so).
In the January version of GeoMesa, I had implemented an international date line solution for non-point geometries as follows:
- When indexing a non-point geometry (e.g. Polygon) that overlapped the international date line, I would make sure all of the longitudinal values were unwrapped. In my implementation, this had the consequence of having my indexed geometries span anywhere from -540 degrees longitude to 540 degrees longitude (with at least a portion of the geometry in the [-180, 180] region).
- When querying using GeoMesa, I would actually perform multiple queries in the appropriate redundant regions in space [-540, -180], [-180, 180], and [180, 540] to make sure I captured any geometries that spanned the international date line.
With the latest version of GeoMesa, I get the following exception when I try to index a non-point geometry (by unwrapping the longitude) that spans the international date line:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.Exception: ERROR: Could not find a suitable 0-bit MBR for the target geometry: POLYGON ((179.31530746783775 -39.87427143505418, 179.31530746783775 -37.87427143505418, 181.31530746783775 -37.87427143505418, 181.31530746783775 -39.87427143505418, 179.31530746783775 -39.87427143505418))
at geomesa.utils.geohash.GeohashUtils$.getMinimumBoundingGeohash(GeohashUtils.scala:241)
at geomesa.utils.geohash.GeohashUtils$.decomposeGeometry_(GeohashUtils.scala:535)
at geomesa.utils.geohash.GeohashUtils$.decomposeGeometry(GeohashUtils.scala:564)
at geomesa.core.index.IndexEncoder.encode(IndexEntry.scala:70)
at geomesa.core.index.IndexSchema.encode(IndexSchema.scala:84)
at geomesa.core.data.AccumuloFeatureWriter.writeToAccumulo(AccumuloFeatureWriter.scala:104)
at geomesa.core.data.AppendAccumuloFeatureWriter.write(AccumuloFeatureWriter.scala:130)
at org.geotools.data.AbstractFeatureStore.addFeatures(AbstractFeatureStore.java:324)
at geomesa.core.data.AccumuloFeatureStore.addFeatures(AccumuloFeatureStore.scala:53)
When I try to query outside the [-180, 180] region I get the following exception (even if data does not exist outside of the [-180, 180] region:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalStateException: getX called on empty Point
at com.vividsolutions.jts.geom.Point.getX(Point.java:124)
at geomesa.utils.geohash.GeohashUtils$.getCentroid(GeohashUtils.scala:256)
at geomesa.utils.geohash.GeohashUtils$.getMinimumBoundingGeohash(GeohashUtils.scala:228)
at geomesa.utils.geohash.GeohashUtils$.decomposeGeometry_(GeohashUtils.scala:535)
at geomesa.utils.geohash.GeohashUtils$.decomposeGeometry(GeohashUtils.scala:564)
at geomesa.utils.geohash.GeohashUtils$.getUniqueGeohashSubstringsInPolygon(GeohashUtils.scala:672)
at geomesa.core.index.GeoHashPlanner$class.polyToGeoHashes(QueryPlanners.scala:275)
at geomesa.core.inde I'll get back to you withx.GeoHashKeyPlanner.polyToGeoHashes(QueryPlanners.scala:308)
at geomesa.core.index.GeoHashPlanner$class.polyToPlan(QueryPlanners.scala:280)
at geomesa.core.index.GeoHashKeyPlanner.polyToPlan(QueryPlanners.scala:308)
at geomesa.core.index.GeoHashPlanner$class.getKeyPlan(QueryPlanners.scala:302)
at geomesa.core.index.GeoHashKeyPlanner.getKeyPlan(QueryPlanners.scala:308)
at geomesa.core.index.GeoHashKeyPlanner.getKeyPlan(QueryPlanners.scala:309)
at geomesa.core.index.CompositePlanner$$anonfun$9.apply(QueryPlanners.scala:396)
at geomesa.core.index.CompositePlanner$$anonfun$9.apply(QueryPlanners.scala:396)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:244)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:244)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.map(TraversableLike.scala:244)
at scala.collection.AbstractTraversable.map(Traversable.scala:105)
at geomesa.core.index.CompositePlanner.getKeyPlan(QueryPlanners.scala:396)
at geomesa.core.index.IndexQueryPlanner.planQuery(IndexQueryPlanner.scala:171)
at geomesa.core.index.IndexQueryPlanner.getIterator(IndexQueryPlanner.scala:100)
at geomesa.core.index.IndexSchema.query(IndexSchema.scala:98)
at geomesa.core.data.AccumuloFeatureReader.<init>(AccumuloFeatureReader.scala:32)
at geomesa.core.data.AccumuloDataStore.getFeatureReader(AccumuloDataStore.scala:294)
at geomesa.core.data.AccumuloDataStore.getFeatureReader(AccumuloDataStore.scala:55)
at org.geotools.data.AbstractDataStore.getFeatureReader(AbstractDataStore.java:369)
at org.geotools.data.DefaultFeatureResults.reader(DefaultFeatureResults.java:215)
at org.geotools.data.store.DataFeatureCollection.openIterator(DataFeatureCollection.java:231)
at org.geotools.data.store.DataFeatureCollection.iterator(DataFeatureCollection.java:199)
at org.geotools.data.store.DataFeatureCollection.features(DataFeatureCollection.java:188)
at org.geotools.data.store.DataFeatureCollection.features(DataFeatureCollection.java:79)
...
My questions are:
1) Is this behavior a bug?
2) if it's not a bug, what are some alternate approaches to indexing/querying non-point geometries that span the international date line? Any direct guidance would be appreciated.
My ideal GeoMesa solution would be:
A) When I index geometries, I could provide GeoMesa unwrapped longitudes in order to remove ambiguity as to what the geometry represents in actual space (e.g. a small polygon crossing the international dateline vs. a large polygon covering almost the entire world).
B) When I query, I would prefer querying only the [-180, 180] longitudinal region and have GeoMesa/GeoTools be smart enough to detect overlaps with my unwrapped indexed geometries.
Thanks,
Beau
_______________________________________________
geomesa-users mailing list
geomesa-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/geomesa-users
