[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [gef-dev] Zest builds
|
Maybe an EMF approach would make sense here. i.e., EMF+SDO+XSD ->
GEF+Zest.
Changing the meaning of GEF-SDK or GEF-ALL could cause confusion among
existing consumers (including build scripts) of GEF builds.
-Randy
"Nick Boldt"
<codeslave@xxxxxx
.com> To
Sent by: "GEF development"
gef-dev-bounces@e <gef-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ian Bull"
clipse.org <irbull@xxxxxxxxxx>
cc
12/11/2007 11:16 Subject
PM Re: [gef-dev] Zest builds
Please respond to
GEF development
<gef-dev@eclipse.
org>
My understanding is that my role as build monkey will begin post-M4, so
yes, coordination w/ me after M4 is done next week will work.
Will the new GEF build will continue to provide ALL (SDK + Examples), SDK,
Runtime, Examples, Tests, plus a new bundle for all the Zest bits?
Or should Zest be distributed across (integrated into) the ALL, SDK,
Runtime, Examples, and Tests? Or be a separate component (and thus separate
build, with its own 1+ zips/update jars)?
FYI, I'm on vacation Dec 17 - 19 and Dec 24 - Jan 06, so I won't be doing
much during that time. ;-)
Nick
On Dec 11, 2007 9:24 PM, Ian Bull <irbull@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,
What do I need to do now to get Zest into the GEF project build? I am
starting to put the website together (along with links to the snippets I
have). Assuming everything goes through with Nick (as our new release
engineer), should I would with him on this?
Thanks,
Ian
--
R. Ian Bull
PhD Candidate, University of Victoria
http://www.ianbull.com
http://irbull.blogspot.com/
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
gef-dev mailing list
gef-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gef-dev
_______________________________________________
gef-dev mailing list
gef-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gef-dev
