[escet-dev] Openness/transparency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[escet-dev] Openness/transparency

From: Dennis Hendriks <dh_tue@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 12:13:17 +0000
Accept-language: nl-NL, en-US
Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=4MZuNXJ5w28ojAbgC2oKRCf8i8mz20Rl4Xn3SV16akE=; b=nPv3cE98I5VSGD5yGbaJEvg97lCwbqo4HK6EfTby8vCaZFBezWs4sZzzwleveLM2FGESuE4jOnTl65AkCOSAvqqIlrauN1IoM6YtM2/1d2z/eyEFUpSqx56IlD5bWBx3DoHK0Qv7S9CI908Ix1WolFn+fkopz9ELLyppb6NaFD/YoBUViIArxXcIWESQlgT9J0B0SHcUU47XFzI3AxsqHd4n6HXmdB/zdhoxIaq2V4E3VWc7x5EFlggviWzQ60KdE1pyMIfgwwmkK7PWZhe0F4pkG81g/7jnvPN1N/hyscrUMEUzD/8iSgDwlVBunncSnRoYm946k2BPczvJCBgvSw==
Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=XdHuvWS61zhW0W6k667EXKPHlv5Y+Tni3KgPdQik8bRMgyQ1BAEGj1hPaNqSl5BNPtuUYkW3QXSKmGEPVpxIPRe5+6AQnwnVO6l7nXvoLMBkC0O48Abks4GpJjgT2pMe7rm2BQNoaAhkb+nxl4/Jxs56t3DQpi+PfJzHJpK6Dtv6LEuWXtKfuIjEqdLbsiauh3e39cCtezBiS53xPbfXyW9U1JplAiSE7fs5P+baIxgXEgRthbl1KZ6+g/VCbBH1qVjSX9KNMVWtQlYMOASWqDiimibWT4TJ2ZYZopoZoC3Ai/RsSIjMhbRyC5COZH/s7LRoc9N7UbhosdpaBVkOAA==
Delivered-to: escet-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/escet-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:escet-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/escet-dev>, <mailto:escet-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/escet-dev>, <mailto:escet-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AQHXZDrmiRlGh0AdF0K/Q/BRfxEdlQ==
Thread-topic: Openness/transparency

Hi Albert

I noticed you created issues like #122 and #124 and then immediately provided a branch / merge request. Are these things that have been worked on in the past (in a fork for a closed-source research project), that are now being contributed to open source? Or did you do work on them specifically for Eclipse ESCET?

It would be preferable if you could create the issue before you start working on it, to improve openness and transparency. Now suddenly there is an issue and a solution, without the possibility for the other committers and the larger community to discuss the ideas.

Dennis

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [escet-dev] Openness/transparency
  - From: Hofkamp, Albert

Prev by Date: Re: [escet-dev] Unpacker error on GitLab
Next by Date: [escet-dev] Committer Election for Ferdie Reijnen on Eclipse ESCET (Supervisory Control Engineering Toolkit) has started
Previous by thread: [escet-dev] Unpacker error on GitLab
Next by thread: Re: [escet-dev] Openness/transparency
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs