| Fw: [equinox-dev] Code move timeline |
|
Unfortunately due to some IP legal issues that need to be worked out (see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=242307) we are not ready to perform the move this week. Given that M1 week is next week we will have to delay the move until mid August. Stay tuned.
I opened a bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=242307 to initiate the CVS move/copy. I documented the projects that are moving and their new location in the RT CVS repository at http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_Eclipse_to_RT_Migration#CVS_Projects. Please let me know if you find any errors. I requested that they give us a heads on the time they will perform the move so that we have some warning before the move actually occurs. Stay tuned. Tom
Would be good to summarize the transformation/copy information in a new list somewhere. We will have to give this to the webmaster to execute the copy operation anyway and there seem to have been some tweaks since the original proposal. Jeff Thomas Watson wrote:
Tom
As discussed in the Equinox call today, I compared the contents of the p2 project set files with the list of bundles in the repository at: org.eclipse.equinox/p2/bundles/ and they are the same... all bundle should be copied during the Equinox move. (bundles which are not listed in the current psf file are part of the new publisher work) As well, we should copy the p2 releng project: org.eclipse.equinox/p2/org.eclipse.equinox.p2.releng Although I am not sure the best location for it. Will the resulting folders in the RT repository have bundle/ folders with the bundles in them, or will the bundles be at the root? (e.g. org.eclipse.equinox/p2 or org.eclipse.equinox/p2/bundles?)
We discussed this at the Tuesday Equinox call. It looks like a large part of the team will be on vacation at the end of July. The proposal is to move the equinox projects to RT during the week of July 28th. We also discussed what to do with the equinox incubator. At this time we are going to wait for the new Eclipse Development Process to be approved (hopefully in August). The new process should allow us to create incubator projects under any project in Eclipse. This will allow us to create an incubator project for equinox directly under the equinox project in RT. Jeff and I have been discussing the layout of the different components of Equinox. Today we have Bundles, Framework, p2, Security. The Bundles category has become kind of a dumping ground for many unrelated bundles. We would like to split these bundles out into three categories: osgi-compendium - All bundles that implement one of the osgi compendium specifications. This includes the following projects: org.eclipse.equinox.app org.eclipse.equinox.cm org.eclipse.equinox.device org.eclipse.equinox.ds org.eclipse.equinox.event org.eclipse.equinox.http org.eclipse.equinox.http.jetty (jetty5 and jetty6 impls) org.eclipse.equinox.io org.eclipse.equinox.ip org.eclipse.equinox.log org.eclipse.equinox.metatype org.eclipse.equinox.preferences org.eclipse.equinox.useradmin org.eclipse.equinox.util org.eclipse.equinox.wireadmin org.eclipse.osgi.services org.eclipse.osgi.util components - The bundles that provide infrastructure to developing components in Equinox. This includes the following projects: org.eclipse.equinox.common org.eclipse.equinox.registry org.eclipse.equinox.transforms.hook org.eclipse.equinox.transforms.xslt server-side - The server side bundles. org.eclipse.equinox.http.registry org.eclipse.equinox.http.servlet org.eclipse.equinox.http.servletbridge org.eclipse.equinox.jsp.jasper org.eclipse.equinox.jsp.jasper.registry org.eclipse.equinox.servletbridge This would result in the following CVS structure in RT org.eclipse.equinox/components org.eclipse.equinox/framework org.eclipse.equinox/osgi-compendium org.eclipse.equinox/p2 org.eclipse.equinox/security org.eclipse.equinox/server-side All commiters with rights to the projects contained in Bundles will continue to have access to all the projects which got moved to the three new categories. We are not trying to create more fine grained commit rights. Instead we are just trying to create a layout that makes sense in CVS and Bugzilla. Thoughts? Tom
Hi, I would like to know what is the time line for moving the equinox code into the runtime repository? PaScaL_______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev _______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev [attachment "pic12833.gif" deleted by Thomas Watson/Austin/IBM] _______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev _______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev _______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev |
