[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [epp-dev] RC2 and IP action items
|
Regarding your question about signed bundles: You are right, only the final builds are signed. E.g. the (hopefully final RC2) build
http://build.eclipse.org/technology/epp/epp_build/36/download/20100527-0641/ will be signed.
Regards, Markus
On 27 May 2010 14:57, Zsolt Beothy-Elo
<zsolt.beothy-elo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Markus,
just had a look at the RC2 version of the SOA package build 20100526-1641. I noticed that the EPP bundles are not signed. Don't know if that is intended and only the final builds are signed. See also my answer within your text.
Regards,
Zsolt
Am 26.05.2010 um 09:29 schrieb Markus Knauer:
Hi package maintainers,
here is a reminder to test the packages as early as you can, because the timeframe between the final builds (Thursday) and the release (Friday) doesn't allow any rebuilds or major changes. The sooner I can apply your patches to the configurations, the better. And a new EPP build starts every time the /releases/staging content changes.
But now... IMPORTANT - two action items for you:
(1) As every year I need from each package maintainer a status about the content of his/her package. Does it contain content from projects that are in incubation? If so we need to include "-incubation-" in the file name and change the description that appears on the download page. In the Galileo release we had Modeling and SOA as incubation packages, now I suspect that the LinuxTools falls under that category.
The SOA package still contains parts that are in incubation.
Please answer to this mailing list whether your package contains incubation components or not.
(2) Bug 313900: update EPL license in the packages (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=313900)
I updated the license in *all* packages. Please review what I did and tell me if I need to revert this change for your package. Or open another bug if I need to adjust something.
The "EPP SOA Bundle" contains the latest SUA. So, I think it's fine.
<ATT00001.c>
_______________________________________________
epp-dev mailing list
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev
