Re: [epf-dev] Software Development Metrics

[Peter Haumer <phaumer@xxxxxxxxxx>]

No, it was just not in scope, yet.  Any
suggestions are very welcome.

In SPEM 2.0 we modeled Metrics as Describable
Elements (i.e. documentation) that also own a list of formal UML Infrastructure
Value Specifications, which is what we currently planning of implementing.



Thanks and best regards,
Peter Haumer.

______________________________________________________________

PETER HAUMER, Dr. rer. nat.
Rational Method Composer | Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software | IBM Software Group
Tel.: +1 (408) 463-5096
______________________________________________________________

"Pamio, Diego" <diego.pamio@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

04/24/2007 19:09

Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List        <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List" <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[epf-dev] Software Development Metrics

Did anyone tried to model process
& product metrics method elements with EPF? How is the best way to
do it? I know this seems just not to be an [epf-“DEV”] question, but
mi concern is that the “metrics” world has been considered or just that
when designing the epf-composer, a better solution to handle the metrics
problematic was found, like, for instance, a combination of tasks, guidelines,
terms definitions, roles and workproducts (that is, roles for metrics collection
and reporting responsibles, guidelines for metrics computation, terms definitions
for formulae, workproducts for source data and tasks to glue everything).
 
Which are your experiences
on the topic?
 
Regards,
Diego N. Pamio
asdc
Argentina Software
Development Center
Intel Software de Arg.
++54 351 414 5571
 _______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev