[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
[epf-dev] Monday RM + PM Conf Call - Priorities?
|
Hi,
from the below meeting minutes it is
clear that we will focus the RM review Monday 8 AM Pacific time on
----------------------------------
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162628
(Role Analyst)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162639
(RM Artifacts)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162634
(RM Tasks)
A conference call is scheduled for
8am pacific time on Monday, November 20 (see here http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/epf-dev/msg01307.html).
Those 3 bugs contain tons of smaller
issues, so that will keep us busy (note that you should if at all possible
review the attachments in those bugs so we can have a focused meeting.)
---------------------------------
There is tons of stuff to cover on the
PM call at 9 AM Pacific, and we will only be able to cover a fraction in
an hour. Do we have a similar prioritization for that call so we know what
people should focus their review on?
Shall we use the same order as we use
for RM? This would give:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=163863
(PM Role)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=163864
(PM Tasks)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=163868
(PM Artifacts)
A conference call is scheduled
for 9am pacific time on Monday, November 27 (see here http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/epf-dev/msg01319.html).
I think this will give us plenty to focus
on. Sorry if this was already covered in some e-mail....
Thanks
Per Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
(M) 408-219-2963
"Brian Lyons"
<blyons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
11/16/2006 03:53 PM
Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
<epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To
| "Eclipse Process Framework Project
Developers List" <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [epf-dev] Minutes from yesterday's content
concall |
|
hiho,
We had a conference call yesterday at 8am
pacific time. The minutes are attached.
It is pretty lengthy. One time-sensitive
issue is that we have three coarse-grained bugs based on Jim Ruehlin’s
review of the Requirements content. Chris Sibbald, Requirements package
owner, has attached a spreadsheet to each of the bugs asking that additional
reviewers at their comments to Jim’s issues in that form by COB on Friday,
November 17. Here are the relevant bugs:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162628
(Role Analyst)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162639
(RM Artifacts)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162634
(RM Tasks)
------------------- b_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
Attachment:
Meeting Minutes - 061115.doc
Description: Binary data