Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [epf-dev] Official voting record - new Committers - Batch2


Hi Saravanan.S,

it is great that you are interested in participating in the project.
I suggest that you

a) familiarize yourself with the technology, and the 3 components if you have not already done so, by looking through the info on http://www.eclipse.org/epf/

b) Specify what you want to work on. Do you want to work on agile, BUP, and/or tooling/meta model? The more specific you can be, the better? Based on what you said regarding process technology, it sounds as if you are interested in the tooling/metamodel component.

c) Start joining some of the meetings for the component(s) you and your company are interested in. The tooling team is just about to start up meeting (biweekly, I believe), and the BUP team has pretty frequent meetings. You will see a posting on what areas will be worked upon in the next couple of days.

d) consider joining the face-to-face meetings in Bilbao, Spain on March 6-7 and Santa Clara, CA, on March 23-24.

Cheers

Per Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
408-342-3815



"Sankar, Saravanan (Cognizant)" <Saravanan.Sankar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

02/27/2006 09:04 PM

Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To
"Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List" <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
RE: [epf-dev] Official voting record - new Committers - Batch2





Hi,
 
            I am Saravanan.S from Cognizant Technology Solutions India. As part of our process improvement initiatives we also do lot of R&D on process automation and process enactment. To learn more and share our knowledge in this area, we also like to contribute and join in this EPF project development initiative. Please let
us know the procedures for the same.
 
For more information about our organization, please visit: www.cognizant.com
 
Regards
Sarav.S
 
 



From: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Per Kroll
Sent:
Tuesday, February 28, 2006 1:32 AM
To:
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
[epf-dev] Official voting record - new Committers - Batch2

 

The following people have been voted in as committers, with 3 yes, and 0 obstain and vetos.


- Kurt Sand - Telelogic

- Chris Sibbald - Telelogic

- Brian Haughton – BearingPoint

- Bruce MacIsaac - IBM

- Jim Ruehlin - IBM

- Todd Fredrickson - IBM

- Naveena Bereny - IBM

- Scott Ambler - AmbySoft

- DJ de Villiers - Ivar Jacobson International


Voting record are per the following links

http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/epf-dev/msg00020.html

http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/epf-dev/msg00021.html

http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/epf-dev/msg00026.html


I will now notify the PMC of the results, and tomorrow fill in the forms on behalf of the PMC.


Thanks


Per Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
408-342-3815

----- Forwarded by Per Kroll/Cupertino/IBM on 02/27/2006 11:57 AM -----

Per Kroll/Cupertino/IBM

02/20/2006 01:54 PM


To
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
 
Subject
Vote on new Committers - Batch2

 


   




Hi,


we need to vote on new committers, batch 2. We need 3 yes, and no veto to accept a new committer.

I am voting yes through this e-mail.


If there are other people that expect to become committers, but are not on the list below, please send me a note asap and we will do one more vote. I do not want to vote on people that are still iffy on whether they will be committers or not, and I know many organizations are still finalizing who should be a committer.


The following people have voting rights (and no others need to reply):

- Peter Haumer

- Ricardo Balduino

- Jim Thario

- Per Kroll

- Charlie Yan

- Kelvin Low

- Jao Tham

We need +3 of you to respond with Yes. You can also Obstain or Veto. If you veto, you need to provide a reason for your veto within 24 hours, or your veto is ignored.

<The people that were voted on last week has not yet become confirmed committers, and does hence not yet have the right to vote. I am filing the forms (#3 on http://www.eclipse.org/legal/newcommitter.php) for you today, and if you have done #2, and #4, it should only take a few more days.>


- Kurt Sand - Telelogic

- Chris Sibbald - Telelogic

- Brian Haughton – BearingPoint

- Bruce MacIsaac - IBM

- Jim Ruehlin - IBM

- Todd Fredrickson - IBM

- Naveena Bereny - IBM

- Scott Ambler - AmbySoft

- DJ de Villiers - Ivar Jacobson International



Again, if you expected your name here, and it is not, it is because I am still uncertain of whether you are firm as a committer. Please send me a note confirming that you should be a committer.

For those in Europe that has expressed interest, but have not yet had a chance to become fully engaged, we may wait until you had a chance to attend the March 6-7 meeting before making you committers.


Thanks


Per Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
408-342-3815

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful.

Visit us at http://www.cognizant.com

_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev


Back to the top