| [emft-dev] Re: [modeling-pmc] EMFT "Project" Compare 0.7.0 release without a Release Review? |
Bjorn,
I'll ask Cedric to rename it as a release candidate and to schedule a
*component* release review before declaring a release publicly like this.
Please take note other component leads!
And I'll ask Nick to looking into using ?component= instead of ?project= to
avoid potential confusion (because goodness knows things are confusing
enough already).
Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
905-413-3265 (t/l 969)
Bjorn
Freeman-Benson
<bjorn.freeman-be To
nson@xxxxxxxxxxx> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Sent by: emft-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
modeling-pmc-boun cc
ces@xxxxxxxxxxx emo@xxxxxxxxxxx, "'Janet Campbell'"
<janet.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
09/12/2007 02:40 [modeling-pmc] EMFT "Project"
PM Compare 0.7.0 release without a
Release Review?
Please respond to
PMC members
mailing list
<modeling-pmc@ecl
ipse.org>
Dear Modeling PMC and EMFT Developers,
Why is it that the EMFT Compare component has released a 0.7.0 release
without an official Release Review?
http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emft/downloads/?project=compare
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/previous-release-reviews.php
All projects must have Release Reviews for M.N releases, including 0.N
releases. The Release Reviews are important for a number of reasons.
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/development_process.php#6_3_3_Release_Review
Please explain how the EMFT project did not have a Release Review.
- Bjorn
P.S. And why does it say "?project=" on that URL when it's a component, not
a project?
--
Bjorn
Freeman-Ben
son
Director,
Open Source
Process
Eclipse
Foundation
voice: 971-327-7323 (Pacific Time)
email: bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc