Anthony,
It's up to Christian to decide for Query. I believe he's indicated
he'll keep it around for one more release.
I've heard nothing in response to SDO. I'm seeing little value in
keeping it around, but I suppose the cost of keeping it on artificial
life support is minimal as well. I'm leaning towards ditching it...
Anthony Hunter wrote:
Hi Ed/Christian,
Just to end this thread, we are not terminating SDO or EMF Query and
both will be in Galileo. Right?
Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
IBM Rational Software: Aurora / GEF / GMF / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-270-4613
Ed Merks
---09/17/2008 02:25:14 AM---Christian, Like SDO, I see Query as having
little real value to justify its
Christian,
Like SDO, I see Query as having little real value to justify its
existence. So like Query, I'm considering terminating the SDO
component. Components that don't have a significant established user
base and for which there is no interesting future don't really don't
have a place at Eclipse. If there is really only one user, they can of
course maintain the source themselves.
Christian W. Damus wrote:
Anthony,
I forgot to answer your other questions. I don't
know about GMF, but Transaction build only requires the Query for the
3-in-1 feature that it publishes to the Ganymede/Galileo builds. The
Transaction and Validation components have no dependencies, and can
build without it.
cW
On 16-Sep-08, at 1:47 PM, Anthony Hunter wrote:
Hi Christian,
We are getting more information for you, but IBM makes use of EMF Query
in its products. So it cannot go away for Galileo. We would be fine
with creating a 1.3 version that has no new content, but just confirms
from a build and smoke test perspective that it still works and is at
the high standard of quality as the other components in Galileo.
I am wondering why EMF Transaction and GMF have a build dependency on
EMF Query for the last three years ? (I.e. EMF Query is listed on the
dependencies on the download page).
Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
IBM Rational Software: Aurora / GEF / GMF / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-270-4613
<graycol.gif>"Christian W.
Damus" ---09/16/2008 12:14:49 PM---Hi, all, The EMF project has had,
since Callisto days, a Query component
<ecblank.gif>
From: |
<ecblank.gif>
"Christian W. Damus" <cdamus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
<ecblank.gif>
To: |
<ecblank.gif>
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
<ecblank.gif>
Date: |
<ecblank.gif>
09/16/2008 12:14 PM |
<ecblank.gif>
Subject: |
<ecblank.gif>
[emf-dev] Status of the EMF Query Component |
Hi, all,
The EMF project has had, since Callisto days, a Query component
providing a Java API with an SQL-ish feel for structured searches in
EObject data. Since its 1.0 release, this component has not added any
new features except for keeping up with its dependencies: following EMF
Core in adopting J2SE 5.0, and adopting new OCL APIs.
It seems to me that this component never did show much "traction" from
the user community and I have no plan to initiate any new work for the
Galileo release. A summary of Bugzilla activity looks like this:
- Raised/resolved since the Ganymede
(1.2) release: 0 / 0
- Raised/resolved since the Europa
(1.1) release: 9 / 9
- Raised/resolved since the Callisto
(1.0) release: 11 / 12
- Raised/resolved since the initial
commit: 11 / 10
Note that a significant number of these bugs were releng-type bugs
tagged against the Query component but applying to common/replicated
artifacts and processes across the EMF Query/Transaction/Validation
components and also MDT OCL.
So, my questions to the community are:
- Do you use the EMF Query component?
- Are you interested in continuing
to develop the EMF Query component?
- I am happy to help
contributors to earn committer rights by working with them on their
patches.
Your feed-back is very important to determining whether this component
will have a 1.3 release in Galileo, whether it should just produce a
maintenance release for Galileo, or whether it should proceed to a
Termination Review.
Thanks,
Christian
--
Christian W. Damus
Senior Software Developer, Zeligsoft Inc.
Component Lead, Eclipse MDT OCL and EMF-QTV
E-mail: cdamus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
--
Christian W. Damus
Senior Software Developer, Zeligsoft
Inc.
Component Lead, Eclipse MDT OCL and
EMF-QTV
E-mail: cdamus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
|