Re: [ejb-dev] How can we best make the EJB30 tests that use Corba option

["Kevin Sutter" <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Yeah, I missed the
application usage requirement...  Thanks!  (It was pointed out
to me by others as well... smile)


---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter 
STSM, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter

Part-time schedule: Tue, Wed, Thu (off on Mon and Fri)



From:
       David
Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
       ejb
developer discussions <ejb-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
       02/25/2021
14:34
Subject:
       [EXTERNAL]
Re: [ejb-dev] How can we best make the EJB30 tests that use Corba optional
but still require other non-Corba tests to be run?
Sent
by:        "ejb-dev"
<ejb-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>

---

> On Feb 25, 2021, at 12:07 PM, David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> 
> Our original status in EE prior to EJB 2.0 was that CORBA was optional
and PortableRemoteObject.narrow was required. Specifically, servers could
support CORBA or not, but users were strictly told they must always use
PortableRemoteObject.narrow regardless.  The reason this was required
was for application portability concerns; if an app didn't make the call,
it couldn't be ported to a server that used CORBA.

Here is the description of why PortableRemoteObject.narrow was required.


-David

_______________________________________________
ejb-dev mailing list
ejb-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ejb-dev