Re: [ee4j-pmc] So there is no lazy consensus for votes?

["Kevin Sutter" <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Scott,
According to the
Eclipse guidelines, a committer election requires three +1 votes (with
no -1 votes).  Since your CDI team is so small, you might need to
nudge Emily and/or Matej to cast the final +1 vote to get Mark in.  There
is no lazy consensus for committer elections.


---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter 
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter



From:
       Scott
Stark <starksm64@xxxxxxxxx>
To:
       EE4J
PMC Discussions <ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
       09/24/2019
03:05 PM
Subject:
       [EXTERNAL]
[ee4j-pmc] So there is no lazy consensus for votes?
Sent
by:        ee4j-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

We ran a new CDI member vote:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/ee4j.cdi/elections/election-mark-struberg-committer-jakarta-contexts-and-dependency-injection

That failed because it did not receive
enough votes? There are only 4 CDI committers currently, so what is the
required number of votes to have a new committer added?
_______________________________________________
ee4j-pmc mailing list
ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc