Re: [ee4j-pmc] module names

[Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2018-10-03 11:11 AM, Bill Shannon wrote:

Sadly, yes.

Given that, I don't think that option #3 is a realistic alternative. Even though the module names shouldn't change, it means that if we get anything incorrect or fail to foresee a case where a java.* module name is required in the future we would have to negotiate an amendment to the legal agreement. Please don't do that.

Raymond Auge wrote on 10/3/18 6:58 AM:

Bill, just clarifying but, #3 means that every single java.* name would have to be predefined, i.e. hard coded, into the license?

--

Mike Milinkovich

Executive Director | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.

mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

@mmilinkov

+1.613.220.3223 (m)

Meet us at EclipseCon Europe 2018: Germany, October 23 - 25

---

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com