I agree. Proposing a new project doesn’t make things worse. I start working on the proposal if everybody agree.
— Dmitry
Hi,Looking through the list of projects
that in flight (https://www.eclipse.org/ee4j/status.php),
it looks like the only API project that we're missing is JSF. When
we proposed Mojarra, we knew this was the case. We indicated this
would be one of the first steps for Mojarra to break out the API (and TCK)
into a separate project. From the Scope of the Mojarra project proposal:"(Note: The API and TCK will be parsed into
a separate Eclipse project once this initial project population for EE4J
is complete.)"I'm wondering if we should start to
complete that picture now. Let's propose the JSF project and get
it provisioned and ready for the Mojarra API and TCK contributions. The
reason for this request is to have a landing spot for Spec or API related
issues. We just ran into an issue while testing Liberty for CTS compliance
and the resolution requires an update to the JSF specification. Where
should we log that type of an issue If we had a JSF project, that
would be the proper place. In the mean time, we are going to log
it in Mojarra, just so that we don't forget about it.What do you guys think? Since
we have projects for all of the major Specifications/APIs, I think it would
be good to have one for JSF. Even if it's just a placeholder until
we get actual code contributed (kind of like the TCK project). --------------------------------------------------- Kevin Sutter STSM, MicroProfile and Java EE architect e-mail: sutter@xxxxxxxxxx Twitter: @kwsutter phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office) LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter_______________________________________________ ee4j-pmc mailing list ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxTo change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc
|