[eclipselink-users] Timeout for Sequencing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[eclipselink-users] Timeout for Sequencing

From: Florian Schaetz <Florian.Schaetz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:29:05 +0100
Accept-language: de-DE
Acceptlanguage: de-DE
Delivered-to: eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/eclipselink-users>
List-help: <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users>, <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/eclipselink-users>, <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: Acz8Q/iMwxtcOv/aSMSkcm2uSsQ5tQ==
Thread-topic: Timeout for Sequencing

Hi,

we’re working with EclipseLink 2.1.3 here. When using a seperate connection for sequencing (eclipselink.jdbc.sequence-connection-pool = true) it seems that it isn’t easily possible to configure a timeout for this connection and the default is 0 (=no timeout). We found a way to do so by manually inserting a ConnectionPool into the sequencing, but that’s not really straight forward.

Is there another way? Perhaps a setting? Or has this perhaps been changed in a more recent version?

mfG

Florian Schätz

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eclipselink-users] Timeout for Sequencing
  - From: Guy Pelletier

Prev by Date: Re: [eclipselink-users] question about composite persistence unit
Next by Date: [eclipselink-users] SequencingManager question
Previous by thread: [eclipselink-users] Problem on persisting ElementCollection mapping inside an embedded object
Next by thread: Re: [eclipselink-users] Timeout for Sequencing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs