[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [eclipselink-users] Re: EclipseLink 2.0.1 jars...?
|
Hi Magnus,
What problem is having the javax.persistence classes in eclipselink.jar
causing? Are you trying to use JPA 2.0 functionality?
I am not a spring expert, but can provide some backgroup.
EclipseLink is packaged in two ways.
1. eclipselink.jar
2. a series of bundles (org.eclipse.persistence.core.jar,
org.eclipse.persistence.jpa.jar, etc...)
eclipselink.jar has some of the javax.persistence classes because although it
is the JPA 2.0 reference implementation, it still supports JPA 1.0 and needs
some of those classes to maintain that support.
The bundles have no-such issue and for servers that do not explicitly package
eclipselink.jar likely provide a good way of avoiding this issue. If you need
help selecting the bundles to use, I can help with that.
-Tom
Magnus Heino wrote:
Ok, things are working now.
I replaced ejb-persistence.jar in JBoss with javax.persistence-2.0.0.jar
I then removed the subset of javax.persistence-2.0.0 annotations thats
inside eclipselink-2.0.1.jar. What are those annotations doing there?
/Magnus
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Magnus Heino <magnus@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:magnus@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi.
I'm trying to get EclipseLink 2.0.1 going in a Spring 3.0 app inside
of JBoss 4.2.3
EclipseLink 1.1.3 worked just fine with the ejb-persistence.jar in
JBoss, but with EclipseLink 2.0.1 I don't understand what combo to use.
Should I remove ejb-persistence.jar? What is javax.persistence stuff
doing inside the eclipselink 2.0.1-jar? What is the
javax.persistence-jar?
No matter what combo I try, I either get missing classes, or
colliding classed with linkageerrors... :-P
Thanks!
--
/Magnus Heino
--
/Magnus Heino
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users